Part 53 (1/2)

”Which is the best form of government, and what was that form which first prevailed among mankind?

”Can any one particular form of government suit all mankind?

”What is the reason that the tides rise higher in the Bay of Fundy than the Bay of Delaware?

”Is the emission of paper money safe?

”What is the reason that men of the greatest knowledge are not the most happy?

”How may the possession of the lakes be improved to our advantage?

”Why are tumultuous, uneasy sensations united with our desires?

”Whether it ought to be the aim of philosophy to eradicate the pa.s.sions?

”How may smoky chimneys be best cured?

”Why does the flame of a candle tend upwards in a spire?

”Which is the least criminal, a _bad_ action joined with a _good_ intention, or a _good_ action with a _bad_ intention?

”Is it inconsistent with the principles of liberty in a free government, to punish a man as a libeller when he speaks the truth?”

The foregoing Rules and Questions show that it could not have been an ordinary cla.s.s of young men to meet and discuss such subjects.

Benjamin's talent is manifest both in the organization and the themes considered.

Improvements have been the order of the day since the Junto was organized; but we doubt if there has been much improvement upon the Junto in literary organizations for the young. It is not surprising, that, of the original twelve members, two became surveyors-general; one the inventor of a quadrant; one a distinguished mechanic and influential man; one a merchant of great note and a provincial judge, and all but one respected and honored men. At the same time, Benjamin, the founder, became ”Minister to the Court of St. James,” ”Minister Plenipotentiary to France,” and the greatest Statesman and Philosopher of America, in the eighteenth century.

In old age Doctor Franklin said of the Junto: ”It was the best school of philosophy, morality, and politics that then existed in the Province; for our queries, which were read the week preceding their discussion, put us upon reading with attention on the several subjects, that we might speak more to the purpose; and here, too, we acquired better habits of conversation, every thing being studied in our rules which might prevent our disgusting each other.”

The Junto was copied in England fifty years after Benjamin organized it in Philadelphia, by Cleming Jenkinson (who became Earl of Liverpool) and others; and, within it, they began careers that became ill.u.s.trious. It has been copied in different parts of our own land down to the present day, blessing the people and the country in more ways than one.

”I can tell you how to get over the difficulty,” said Benjamin: ”let each member get up a club of twelve, and that will give a chance for one hundred and forty-four members.”

”And when that number is attained, I suppose you will have each one of the one hundred and forty-four organize a Junto, and that will make the members.h.i.+p seventeen hundred and twenty-eight, enough to const.i.tute a good towns.h.i.+p,” suggested Coleman, who did not endorse Benjamin's plan.

”One Junto will be of more service to members, as well as to the public, than a dozen can be, only abolish the limit to twelve members, and allow all who desire to join,” was Coleman's view.

”More interesting, also, to have a larger number of members,”

suggested Parsons. ”Numbers create enthusiasm.”

”And numbers often create friction, too,” retorted Benjamin; ”we want to avoid both shoals and rocks.”

”Another thing that I object to very much is this: if each one of us organizes another Junto, we no longer a.s.sociate with each other--the very thing for which this Junto was organized.” This was the strongest objection that Coleman urged.

”That is the selfish side of the question,” suggested Benjamin. ”On the other hand, there will be twelve times as many persons to be benefited. If we twelve are benefited, how much better and grander to have one hundred and forty-four benefited!”

”Ben is right; and I am of the opinion that the sooner we adopt this plan the better. It will be unpleasant to sacrifice our social connections to form new ones, but the new ones may become equally pleasant.” Scull thus supported Benjamin's proposition; and so did Meredith, Maugridge, and others.